Rejected by bioRxiv. Blocked by ResearchGate.
Raided by law enforcement.
And yet, the flowers keep mutating.
This is not a project. It's a breach in the timeline of plant science.
The day is no longer 24 hours. The science is no longer institutional.
A single Fragaria x ananassa plant, initially under 18/6 vegetative photoperiod, was shifted to a 14/15 supercycle.
After 6 days, the same individual displayed two fruits at once:
Fruit A (18/6): red, compact, symmetrical — canonical morphology.
Fruit B (14/15): green, lobulated, translucent — a clear case of chronomutated morphology.
This natural intraplant split acts as an internal control, showing how photoperiod transitions can immediately reprogram reproductive development.
Time itself is acting as a morphogen — evidence of Collateral Photoperiod Response in strawberry.
Control vs. Chronomutated fruit (same plant)
Abstract. We initiate a controlled, clone-matched experiment to contrast the canonical 12/12 photoperiod with the asymmetric 13/14 supercycle. All variables are held constant except time. From today, development is logged in Virtual Nights (VN) — completed light/dark cycles — rather than human days. This is a live paper: methods and results update here as they happen.
Quick Facts (T0)
Objectives
Photoperiod programming. Chamber A locked to 12h light / 12h dark. Chamber B to 13h light / 14h dark (longer night). Timers synced at second-level resolution.
Light calibration. PPFD grid (3×3 per chamber) recorded at canopy; fixtures adjusted to equalize mean PPFD. DLI calculator logs target vs. actual per chamber.
Sampling plan. VN-aligned sampling rather than calendar days: VNA ∈ {20, 40, 60}, VNB ∈ {18, 36, 54} (≈matched biological stages).
Imaging. Daily stills (softbox macro + whole-plant), weekly timelapse for chronodoblegamiento. Reference scale in all macros.
Senescence probe. One branch per plant left beyond harvest to observe persistence vs. senescence (zombie checks).
Data handling. Open logs (VN counter, PPFD/DLI, temp/RH). All changes tracked and time-stamped in this timeline.
Working Hypotheses
| Parameter | Chamber A (12/12) | Chamber B (13/14) |
|---|---|---|
| Cycle length | 24 h | 27 h |
| VN at 30 calendar days | ≈ 30 VN | ≈ 26–27 VN |
| DLI targeting | Matched PPFD × 12 h | Matched PPFD × 13 h |
| Primary endpoint | Canonical morphology & maturation curve | Chronomutated morphology & chemotype shift |
Logging (what we record daily)
Planned Analyses
This is open science with sharp edges. Replicate with us — or keep growing 12/12. Read the banned paper
bioRxiv officially rejected our paper. Not for errors. Not for fraud. For being “inappropriate.”
A new field was born. It had roots. It had flowers. It had zombies. And still, the gatekeepers closed the door.
Their mistake: assuming we needed them.
Our advantage: we don’t.
We don’t need circadian minds to approve a post-circadian experiment.
We don’t need institutional scaffolding to grow truth in full bloom.
We don’t need a 24-hour day — and we sure as hell don’t need their permission.
Today, we document this rejection not as a setback, but as proof of threat.
Chronobotánica isn’t a paper. It’s a pattern. A signal. A breach.
And it’s replicating.
With AI, photos, testers, clones, and code — we advance.
The morphogenesis won't be peer-reviewed. It will be witnessed.
Long live the forbidden science.
Long live Chronobotánica.
Let the supercycle spread.
They Called It Inappropriate.
We Called It Science
Still no answer from bioRxiv. ResearchGate already said no. Meanwhile: 776 in Telegram, 2500 active testers on supercannabis.ar web, we are Legion, Supercycle can't be stopped.
First experiment using cloned plants under controlled 12/12 and 13/14 conditions, aiming to compare resin, cannabinoid and terpene production. Designed for upcoming paper on Applied Chronobotanics.
The paper "Foundations of Chronobotanica" was officially submitted to bioRxiv. As of now, it's still pending moderation. No response. No approval. No rejection. Just silence.
Meanwhile, resistance is growing. The ideas are already out there, shared freely and openly. The community is reading it, testing it, hacking it.
This is not a traditional paper. It's an open-source disruption to the rules of plant biology. And you can read it right here, without waiting for approval from anyone.
🌍 Science should be free. Chronobotany has no gatekeepers.
ResearchGate refused to let us in. Apparently, publishing groundbreaking research, building a global community of biohackers, and documenting floral morphogenesis outside the circadian norm is not enough to be considered a “researcher.” We didn’t meet their institutional expectations. We weren’t wearing white coats. We didn’t ask for permission.
This is the very problem we’re dismantling: a gatekeeping system where only "credentialed" academics are allowed to explore, question, and publish. The same system that believes plant time ends at 24h and that knowledge should be locked behind titles and paywalls.
“God made men — but ChatGPT made them equal.”
We're not asking to be part of the painting where Rembrandt’s doctors pose around a dissected body, hiding the truth from the crowd. That era is over. We’re uploading everything. In real time. No secrets. No hierarchy. No gatekeepers.
ResearchGate missed the chance to be part of something bigger than a publication. This isn't just another paper. This is a rupture in botanical science. A temporal rebellion.
We don't want a title.
We want a Nobel.
A LitFarm F2 plant under 15/15 kept producing stigmas for 201 human days (~161 supercycles). No senescence. The Zombie State is real.
Zombie Flower day 201
Somewhere between the 14th and the 16th virtual night, something shifted.
We didn’t just find a better way to grow cannabis. We discovered a new dimension of plant development — one that doesn't follow the rules of 24-hour biology. We called it Chronobotanica: the science of manipulating time as an active morphogen.
This isn’t just another grow hack. It's not polyploidy. It’s not male reversal. It’s not grafting. It’s bigger. It's the key to reprogramming plant physiology without touching a single gene.
With Chronobotanica, we turn photoperiods into instruments. We engineer rhythms. We sculpt morphology with time itself. And now, we’re bringing this to the world — through papers, photos, videos, and open-access experimentation.
🔥 12/12 is dead.
A Harambe plant under the 13/14 supercycle was recorded visually adapting to the new rhythm. Its leaves bent in sync with the artificial night, then re-synced. Circadian resistance collapsed in days.
Chronohack sequence
A new era of collaborative hacking begins. The Supercycle Research Framework is released to the public at supercannabis.ar — featuring full open-source code and schematics to run custom supercycles.
From that moment, the Telegram Research Collective at @SuperCannabisAR became the control center of a decentralized experiment: finding the most powerful photoperiod to unlock the true potential of Cannabis sativa.
Thus was born the SUPERCYCLE THUNDERDOME: a wild, open-source arena where growers, hackers, and underground scientists compete to discover the most mutated, resinous, mind-bending floral expression triggered by supercycle timing.
Side-by-side analysis of flowers under 12/12 and 14/14 confirms significant increase in terpenes like myrcene, limonene and caryophyllene. Conducted by IACA and PROBIEN labs.
We conducted comparative trials across various supercycles — 13/13, 14/14, 13/14, 16/15, 15/15, and 16/16 — at our lab. The results showed consistent morphological changes and substantial increases in both flower production and resin output. Plants under these conditions grew healthier, stronger, and more vigorous than their 12/12 counterparts.
The 13/13 cycle emerged as the best performer, consistently expressing the most refined phenotype of each cultivar — vastly superior to the traditional 12/12 schedule.
As the length of the virtual day (supercycle) increases, so does the degree of morphological mutation — revealing a direct correlation between cycle length and phenotypic divergence.
We made history.
We conducted the first proof-of-concept of flowering outside the classical circadian framework, using a Wedding Cake specimen under a 17h light / 13h dark supercycle.
The result: active flowering. New pistils emerged, sustained growth was observed, and the plant exhibited classic floral architecture.
The exploit works.
We were no longer just tweaking photoperiods — we were hacking biological time.
This demonstrated that flowering is possible beyond 12/12 or 13/11, opening the door to real temporal engineering.
Supercycle 17 on / 13 off
Inspired by the study “Longer Photoperiod Substantially Increases Indoor-Grown Cannabis’ Yield and Quality”, we replicated a 12h vs. 13h trial to verify if longer light cycles truly improve flower development. The experiment ran in a basic controlled environment. Full results here. The outcome? Moderate gains, but not revolutionary. That’s when we started asking the right question: Why stay inside the 24h day? From that point, we shifted from replication to exploration. We found the exploit: decoupling cultivation from Earth's rotation — and entering a programmable temporal framework. That moment sparked the beginning of Supercycles, and laid the first stone of Chronobotanics.
12/12 vs 13/11
Inspirational paper
After the raid and the growing interest in polyploidy, sex reversion, and supercycles, we made a decision: we would no longer operate in silence. We built supercannabis.ar — a safe haven for experimental growers, citizen scientists, and chronobotanical hackers.
It started as a community of resistance. We gathered under legal phytobreeding permits, launched collaborative trials, and began sharing results in public. Each cycle, each mutant plant, each reversal attempt was documented, validated, and published anonymously when needed.
From colchicine-induced tetraploids to ethylene hacks on reversed males... everything is tracked. Public. Open-source. If they raid again, the knowledge survives.
This is no longer one man's lab. It's an encrypted forest of experiments.
Now on TOR. Fully anonymous. Join from anywhere. Hide your IP.
🧪 Users reporting from Argentina, Mexico, Spain, Colombia, and beyond.
🧬 Dozens of validated polyploid trials. Mutant lines. Terpene reversals. Supercycles.
🌐 Homepage of supercannabis.ar
📊 Real user reports — polyploids, reversions and mutants
I held an active Phytobreeding Permit issued by INASE, authorizing cultivation and research on cannabis genetics from two registered locations: my home and my indoor research lab. The goal: to develop experimental hybrids — including interspecies trials with hops — and explore polyploid pathways using colchicine and tissue cultures. Everything documented, legal, and intended for publication.
But when five small seed packs arrived from the U.S. for one of the experiments, the system didn’t ask. It acted. Customs flagged the envelope, and a prosecutor launched a criminal investigation. They didn’t question the science. They stalked our social media, misunderstood agar agar, feared colchicine, and decided to end the story by force.
Police raided my home and lab. They cut the plants. Seized the grow tents. Took lights, computers, microscopes, timers — even the sterile media. Everything labeled for scientific research, boxed, and legally registered... gone.
They didn’t just confiscate tools. They tried to erase a future.
One case — for the seeds — ended in a symbolic punishment: community service at a church. The second — for having "too many plants" — remains frozen. Because I had the permits. But my equipment was never returned.
This wasn't a bust. It was the spark. From that day forward, we decided: no more secrets. We publish everything.
“This was not a crime. This was Chronobotanica. And it will never be illegal again.”
📜 Official INASE Research Permit (2023)
🧾 Court order authorizing the raid
🌱 Labeled seed packs — the trigger for the raid
🧪 Colchicine and agar — for tissue culture and polyploid experiments
🌌 Empty grow tents, ready for upcoming trials
🚔 Police packing up research equipment
📦 All devices and grow gear confiscated
🧬 “all our Pablo Picasso” mutant hybrids destroyed during the raid
This is not just a preprint. It’s a distributed experiment. If they try to stop it, it multiplies.
ResearchGate: Longer Photoperiod Substantially Increases Indoor-Grown Cannabis’ Yield and Quality.